International Journal of Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Submit Manuscript

International Journal of Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Instructions for authors

Everything required to prepare a manuscript for the International Journal of Sexually Transmitted Diseases: article types and their limits, structure, abstracts, references, figures, ethics statements and the submission checklist.

Primary: ManuscriptZone · Alternative: submission form · Assisted: [email protected]

Formats Four main groups, plus scholarly correspondence Abstract By manuscript format Keywords 5–8, MeSH where applicable References Vancouver, numbered

01 · Contents

Before you begin

A manuscript belongs in IJSTD if its subject is a sexually transmitted pathogen or the clinical, laboratory, epidemiological or preventive response to one. The aims and scope page states each research domain with a worked example and the boundary. If you are not certain where a manuscript falls, send the title and abstract to [email protected] and the editorial office will tell you whether it is worth preparing a full submission.

02 · Article types

Article types and length

Four main manuscript groups cover original research, reviews (including systematic reviews and meta-analyses), case reports or case series, and brief communications or technical notes. Editorials, commentaries and letters are additional scholarly contributions handled with the editorial office. APC categories distinguish these formats without changing their scope. Word counts exclude the abstract, references, tables and figure legends. Charges are set by article type on the article processing charges page, and fall due only after acceptance.

Accepted article types
Article type Length What it is
Original research 4,000–8,000 words Findings from experimental, clinical, epidemiological, behavioral, qualitative or implementation studies of STI prevention, diagnosis, treatment, transmission or care.
Review 6,000–10,000 words A narrative synthesis of an STI-related subject, stating its search strategy, sources, date range and inclusion rationale.
Systematic review and meta-analysis 6,000–10,000 words A synthesis following PRISMA, with a registered protocol where applicable and the completed checklist supplied.
Case report or case series 1,500–3,000 words Unusual presentations, rare infections, unexpected treatment responses or diagnostic challenges with clear learning value, with documented consent and the clinical timeline.
Brief communication or technical note 1,000–2,000 words Preliminary findings, focused methodological innovations, laboratory techniques or surveillance observations with a clear STI-related contribution.
Editorial or commentary Agreed with the editorial office Interpretation of a development, a policy question or a body of evidence in the field, written from stated expertise.
Letter to the editor Agreed with the editorial office A response to a published article, or a brief observation contributing to a discussion already in the journal.

Both review types are peer reviewed on the same criteria as original research. A systematic review is distinguished by a prespecified protocol and a reproducible search, not by its length.

03 · Structure

Manuscript structure

Original research, systematic reviews and technical notes generally follow the IMRAD order below, adapted to the study design. Qualitative work should explain its analytic approach, sampling and reflexivity; methodological work should describe development and appropriate evaluation. Case reports and case series should follow CARE, with patient information, a clinical timeline, diagnostic assessment, treatment, follow-up, learning points and publication consent. Reviews, editorials, commentaries and letters use headings appropriate to the argument. Number sections and subsections consistently, and keep the same order in the manuscript as in the abstract.

  • Introduction. The relevant prior knowledge, the specific gap the study addresses, and the objectives or hypotheses tested. Enough background for a reader from an adjacent discipline; not a literature review.
  • Methods. Design, setting, recruitment and eligibility, exposures or interventions, outcome measures and their definitions, laboratory procedures with assay and platform named, sample-size justification, and the statistical analysis — in enough detail for a qualified investigator to repeat the work.
  • Results. Participant flow, baseline characteristics, then primary outcomes followed by secondary outcomes. Present each finding once, in the text or in a table or a figure, not in all three.
  • Discussion. Interpretation against the existing evidence, comparison with prior studies of the same question, limitations and their effect on the conclusions, the clinical or public-health implications, and the specific research the work now makes possible. No new data.
  • Conclusion. What the study supports, stated no more strongly than the design allows.
  • Back matter. Declarations, acknowledgments, references, then tables, then figure legends.

04 · Front matter

Title page, abstract and keywords

Title
Up to 150 characters, describing the study without abbreviations other than universally recognized ones. Name the design where it aids retrieval.
Running head
Up to 50 characters.
Authors
Full names in the order they are to be published, each with the institutional affiliation held when the work was done and an ORCID iD where the author has one.
Corresponding author
Name, postal address, email address and ORCID iD.
Structured abstract — original research
Up to 250 words under Background, Methods, Results and Conclusions. State the question, the design, the primary numerical findings with confidence intervals, and a conclusion the data support. No references, no undefined abbreviations, nothing absent from the manuscript.
Unstructured abstract — brief communications and technical notes
Up to 150 words, summarizing what was done and what was found.
Unstructured abstract — narrative reviews
Up to 250 words.
Structured abstract — systematic reviews and meta-analyses
Up to 250 words, following PRISMA for abstracts.
Unstructured abstract — case reports and case series
Up to 150 words.
Editorials, commentaries and letters
No abstract is required unless specified when the contribution is commissioned or agreed with the editorial office.
Keywords
Five to eight, using Medical Subject Headings terms where they exist, covering the infection, the method, the population and the outcome.
Peer review
Single-blind by default; double-blind review is available on request. Manuscripts that proceed to external peer review are normally evaluated by at least two independent subject-matter experts.
For double-blind review
For double-blind review, remove author names, affiliations, acknowledgments, funding details, institution names, and other identifying information from the reviewer manuscript. Provide identifying information separately in the title-page file or submission form.

05 · Files

File formats and typography

  • Manuscript file. Microsoft Word.
  • Type. Times New Roman, Arial or Calibri at 12 point.
  • Spacing. Double-spaced throughout, including references, tables and legends.
  • Numbering. Pages numbered consecutively from the title page, with continuous line numbering so reviewers can cite a line.
  • Language. English, in either American or British conventions, applied consistently throughout the manuscript.
  • Units. SI units, with conventional units in parentheses where clinical practice uses them.
  • Abbreviations. Defined at first use in the abstract and again at first use in the main text.
  • Pathogen and drug names. Species names in italics at first use in full; generic drug names, with a proprietary name only where the formulation matters.

Clear, grammatically accurate English helps reviewers assess the science rather than the prose. Language editing is optional, is arranged by the author, and has no bearing on the review outcome or the editorial decision.

06 · Display items

Tables, figures and supplementary files

  • Tables. Built with the word processor's table function, one per page after the reference list, numbered in Arabic numerals in the order they are cited. Each carries a title that lets the table be read without the text, and a legend defining every abbreviation, statistic and symbol.
  • Figures. Supplied as separate files in TIFF, JPEG, PNG or EPS at a minimum of 300 dots per inch, numbered in citation order. Each legend explains the panels, symbols and statistics shown, so the figure can be read on its own.
  • How many. There is no fixed general numerical cap on tables or figures for any accepted article type. Include only those needed to support the work. Cite every display item in the text, in order, and avoid duplication of material already given in the text.
  • Clinical images. Identifiable images require written consent for publication covering the specific image. Do not rely on cropping or masking alone to de-identify.
  • Reused material. Written permission is required for any figure or table reproduced from another source, and the source is cited in the legend.
  • Supplementary files. Extended methods, additional tables, datasets or video, submitted as separate clearly named files and cited at the relevant point in the text. They are peer reviewed with the manuscript and are held to the same standard.

07 · References

References

There is no fixed general numerical cap on references for any accepted article type. Include only the sources needed to support the work and avoid duplicate entries.

Vancouver numeric style: references numbered in the order of first appearance in the text, cited in superscript or in square brackets consistently, and listed in that order. List the first six authors and then et al. Include a DOI wherever one exists. Cite the sources the work requires; verify every detail before submission, because reference errors are the most common cause of delay in production.

  • Journal article. Author AA, Author BB, Author CC. Title of the article. Journal Abbrev. 2025;12(3):145–58. doi:10.0000/example
  • Book. Author AA. Title of the Book. 3rd ed. City: Publisher; 2024.
  • Book chapter. Author AA. Title of the chapter. In: Editor BB, editor. Title of the Book. City: Publisher; 2024. p. 91–110.
  • Web page. Organization Name. Title of the page [Internet]. 2026 [cited 2026 Sep 10]. Available from: https://example.org/page
  • Dataset. Author AA. Title of the dataset [dataset]. Repository Name; 2025. doi:10.0000/dataset
  • Preprint. Author AA, Author BB. Title of the preprint [preprint]. medRxiv; 2026. doi:10.0000/preprint
  • Trial registration. Registry Name. Title of the trial. Identifier NCT00000000. Registered 2025 Jan 14. Available from: https://example.org/NCT00000000

08 · Analysis

Statistics and reporting guidelines

For quantitative analyses, name the software and version, explain sample-size determination and describe missing-data handling. For qualitative work, report the study context, recruitment, researcher role, analytic method and steps taken to support the credibility of the interpretation. Report effect sizes with confidence intervals and exact p-values rather than threshold statements, and distinguish prespecified analyses from those done after the data were seen.

Diagnostic-accuracy studies report sensitivity, specificity and predictive values with confidence intervals, name the reference standard, and state the prevalence in the tested population, because predictive values depend on it. Susceptibility testing names the method and the breakpoints applied, with their source and version.

Submit the completed checklist for the guideline that matches the design, as a supplementary file, with the manuscript page numbers filled in.

Which checklist

CONSORT for clinical trials.
STROBE for observational studies.
PRISMA for systematic reviews.
STARD for studies of diagnostic accuracy.
ARRIVE for animal research.

Where a study design falls outside these, use the closest applicable guideline from the EQUATOR Network and say which you followed.

09 · Ethics

Ethics, consent and privacy statements

Research involving human participants, identifiable information or biological material must include an ethics statement naming the approving committee and reference number, or explaining any exemption or waiver under the applicable requirements. Authors must state whether consent to participate was obtained where required. Written consent for publication is required for identifiable case material. Authors must minimize the risk of identification, including through combinations of indirect details. These statements belong in the Methods section and are checked at screening; a manuscript without them is returned before review.

  • Approval. Name the approving committee and give the protocol reference number, or explain the exemption or waiver granted under the applicable requirements.
  • Consent to participate. State whether informed consent was obtained and how it was documented, including arrangements for participants who could not consent for themselves.
  • Consent to publish. Written consent is required for any identifiable case material, including clinical photographs, and must cover the specific details submitted.
  • Privacy and de-identification. Authors must minimize the risk of identification, including through combinations of indirect details. Withhold or generalize small cell counts, narrow date ranges, single-site descriptors and uncommon combinations of characteristics that together could identify a participant.
  • Trial registration. Interventional clinical trials must be registered in an accepted public trial registry at or before the first participant provides consent for enrollment. The registry name, registration number, and registration date must be reported in the manuscript.
  • Animal research. Report animal care and use committee approval, and follow the ARRIVE guidelines, naming species, strain, housing, anesthesia and analgesia protocols and humane endpoints.

10 · Declarations

Declarations

Competing interests
All financial and non-financial competing interests, for every author. Where there are none, say so.
Funding
Every source, with grant numbers, and any role the funder played in design, analysis or preparation of the manuscript.
Author contributions
What each author did, sufficient to show that each meets the ICMJE authorship criteria.
Data availability
Every empirical research manuscript must include a data-availability statement. Name the repository and identifier, or state the restriction and the conditions under which the data can be obtained.
Generative AI
Disclose any use of generative AI in preparing the manuscript. An AI tool cannot be an author, and the authors remain responsible for everything submitted.
Preprint
Disclose a posted preprint in the cover letter with its DOI. Posting a preprint has no effect on consideration.

11 · Submission

Submitting the manuscript

Three routes reach one editorial office. Authors must use only one submission route for the same manuscript.

  • Primary route — ManuscriptZone

    The publisher's submission system, which tracks the manuscript through review and carries the correspondence. Open ManuscriptZone

  • Alternative route — simple submission form

    A single-page form for a straightforward submission. Open the form with IJSTD selected

  • Assisted route — the editorial office

    Where neither route is workable, write to [email protected] and the editorial office will submit on your behalf.

Submit the manuscript file with tables after the references, the figure files separately, any supplementary files, the completed reporting checklist, and a cover letter addressed to the editorial office stating what the study adds and confirming that the work is not under consideration elsewhere. The corresponding author receives an acknowledgment with a manuscript number to quote in all correspondence.

12 · After a decision

Revision, acceptance and production

  • Revision. Return a revised manuscript with the changes marked, and a point-by-point response to each reviewer comment saying what was changed and where, or why it was not.
  • Acceptance. The article processing charge for the article type falls due on acceptance and is invoiced by the publisher. It has no bearing on the decision, which has already been made.
  • Proofs. Check the proof for errors of fact, spelling of names and affiliations, and the accuracy of figures and tables. Substantive rewriting at proof stage is not possible.
  • Metadata. Author names, affiliations, ORCID iDs and funding information are deposited with Crossref as they appear in the accepted manuscript, so verify them at proof stage: they are what discovery services and citation trackers will carry.
  • Publication. The article is published open access under CC BY 4.0 with a permanent Crossref DOI under the prefix 10.14302, added to the issue that is open, and deposited to Portico for preservation.

13 · Checklist

Submission checklist

  • Article type selected, and the manuscript within its word limit
  • Title within 150 characters; running head within 50
  • Abstract of the required form and length
  • Five to eight keywords
  • Double-spaced, 12 point, with continuous line numbering
  • Tables after the references; figures as separate files at 300 dpi or better
  • Every table and figure cited in the text, in order
  • References in Vancouver numeric style with DOIs
  • Ethics approval, consent and privacy statements in the Methods
  • Trial registration details, where applicable
  • Completed reporting checklist attached
  • Competing interests, funding, contributions and data-availability statements
  • Permissions obtained for any reused material
  • Identifying information removed, if double-blind review is requested
  • Cover letter to the editorial office
  • One submission route only

14 · Routes

Where to go next

International Journal of Sexually Transmitted Diseases (IJSTD) · ISSN 2994-6743 · Crossref DOI prefix 10.14302 · published open access by Open Access Pub under CC BY 4.0. Editorial decisions are independent of any fee, service, membership or role.

Menu