International Journal of Negative Results

International Journal of Negative Results

International Journal of Negative Results – Proposed Special Issue

Open Access & Peer-Reviewed

Submit Manuscript

Proposed Special Issue

Launch a focused collection on negative results, replication, or null findings.

Focused ThemesAddress publication bias and gaps.
Guest EditorsSubject expertise and leadership.
Transparent ReviewRigorous peer review process.
Global ReachOpen access visibility worldwide.

Journal at a Glance

ISSN: 2641-9181
DOI Prefix: 10.14302/issn.2641-9181
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer reviewed open access journal

Scope Alignment

Negative results, null findings, replication studies, methodological transparency, and reproducibility across disciplines. We prioritize rigorous reporting and complete outcomes.

Publishing Model

Open access, single blind peer review, and rapid publication after acceptance and production checks. Metadata validation and DOI registration are included.

Propose a Special Issue

International Journal of Negative Results welcomes special issues that address publication bias, replication challenges, or negative results in specific disciplines. Special issues provide a focused platform to advance transparency and share critical null findings.

Proposals should outline the topic rationale, scope, and target audience, along with a plan for editorial leadership.

What to Include in Your Proposal
  • Special issue title and theme
  • Rationale for relevance to negative results and reproducibility
  • Proposed guest editor bios and affiliations
  • Estimated number of submissions and article types
  • Planned submission and publication timeline
Review and Approval Process

The editorial office reviews proposals for scope fit, feasibility, and editorial capacity. Approved proposals receive guidance on timelines and reviewer selection.

1

Submit

Send a proposal to the editorial office for initial review.

2

Evaluate

Editors assess topic relevance and feasibility.

3

Confirm

Approved proposals receive a timeline and workflow plan.

4

Launch

Call for papers and submission portal activation.

Guest Editor Responsibilities
  • Define scope, article types, and submission criteria
  • Recruit reviewers and oversee peer review timelines
  • Ensure transparency and full outcome reporting
  • Coordinate with the editorial office for decisions
  • Define the research bias or reproducibility gap the special issue will address.
  • Provide a rationale for guest editor expertise and topic coverage.
  • Specify anticipated article types and approximate submission volume.
  • Outline peer review timelines and editorial decision workflows.
  • Describe outreach plans to research communities or consortia.
  • Identify reporting standards or checklists required for submissions.
  • Clarify whether replication or null results are required for scope fit.
  • List any planned invited contributions or consortium partners.
  • Provide proposed metrics for impact or transparency outcomes.
  • Describe data sharing expectations for special issue contributors.
  • Describe how registered reports will be handled in the issue.
  • Clarify whether datasets must be shared upon publication.
Special Issue FAQ

Can special issues include replication studies?

Yes. Replication work is strongly encouraged.

How long does approval take?

Most proposals are reviewed within two weeks.

Can industry partners contribute?

Yes, with full conflict of interest disclosures.

IJNR Commitment

IJNR is committed to rigorous, transparent publishing of negative, null, and inconclusive results. We emphasize reproducible methods, full outcome reporting, and ethical compliance across all article types.

The editorial office supports authors, editors, and reviewers with clear guidance and responsive communication. For questions about scope or workflow, contact [email protected].

We encourage complete reporting, data availability, and candid discussion of limitations to strengthen the research record.

Propose a Special Issue

Share a focused plan to advance transparency in negative results research.