IPJ welcomes reviewers with expertise in physiology, biomedical research, and related disciplines. Reviewers should have a strong publication record and familiarity with peer review standards.

• Current CV or resume
• Areas of expertise and physiology domains
• Recent publications or projects
• Institutional affiliation and contact details

Reviewer registrations are evaluated by the editorial office. Qualified reviewers are added to the database and invited to review manuscripts aligned with their expertise.

Reviewers typically complete two to four reviews per year. Each review requires approximately two to four hours depending on study complexity.

Reviewer registrations are assessed based on expertise, publication history, and alignment with IPJ scope. Qualified reviewers are invited based on manuscript topic relevance.

• Provide a current CV and recent publications
• List physiology domains and methodological strengths
• Confirm availability for timely review cycles
• Disclose conflicts of interest where applicable

Editors and reviewers help maintain the integrity of physiology research. IPJ expects timely, constructive feedback that improves clarity and reproducibility.

• Focus on methodological rigor and physiological relevance.
• Provide actionable comments for authors.
• Declare conflicts of interest before accepting assignments.
• Maintain confidentiality of submitted work.

Timely, fair, and constructive input helps IPJ maintain publication quality.

• Respond to invitations promptly.
• Submit reviews within agreed timelines.
• Provide balanced feedback with actionable guidance.
• Respect confidentiality of submitted work.

IPJ is committed to rigorous, transparent publishing in physiology research. We emphasize reproducible methods, clear reporting of experimental protocols, and ethical compliance across all article types.

The editorial office supports authors, editors, and reviewers with clear guidance and responsive communication. For questions about scope or workflow, contact [email protected].

We encourage continuous improvement in reporting practices and share updates that help the community maintain high standards in human and comparative physiology.