Prospective editors should have a strong publication record, subject expertise, and a commitment to timely, ethical review practices. Appointments are based on qualifications and scope fit.

Editors receive formal recognition and may be invited to lead special issues or contribute editorials. Service letters and certificates are available for institutional reporting and promotion dossiers.

Clear decision letters and timely reviewer coordination maintain consistency and trust. Editors should provide balanced feedback, separate major from minor issues, and recommend actions supported by evidence.

The editorial office provides guidance on conflicts, ethics questions, and workflow issues. Training materials and decision templates help new editors align with journal standards.

Editors commit to fair, timely decisions and uphold confidentiality. Consistent response times support predictable publication timelines and author satisfaction.

Editors are expected to document decision rationale and ensure that reviewer recommendations align with journal standards. Clear records support appeals and maintain consistency.

Editors can suggest new reviewers and mentor early career experts. Building diverse reviewer pools improves expertise coverage and review quality.

Editors should accept assignments that match their expertise and availability. Communicate early if workload changes to keep review timelines stable and maintain author confidence.

Editors should disclose conflicts of interest and recuse themselves when needed. Transparent conflict management protects the fairness of editorial decisions and maintains confidence in the review process.

Editors should communicate decisions respectfully and clearly, outlining key reasons and next steps. Professional communication improves author trust and reduces confusion during revision.