Resources Available

JTR provides decision templates, ethics checklists, reviewer guidance, and policy documents to ensure consistent editorial workflows.

Ongoing Training

Editors receive updates on peer review best practices, ethics guidance, and policy changes to maintain consistent decisions.

Decision Templates

Templates support clear communication of decisions and revision requests. Using consistent language improves author understanding and reduces follow up questions.

Ethics Checklists

Checklists help confirm that ethics approvals, consent statements, and data availability requirements are met before review.

Reviewer Tools

Editors can access reviewer guidance and suggested reviewer databases to identify qualified experts quickly.

Workflow Support

The editorial office assists with reviewer reminders, timeline tracking, and escalation of complex cases.

Policy Library

Editors have access to policy documents covering ethics, corrections, data sharing, and conflicts of interest. These resources support consistent decisions across submissions.

Metrics and Tracking

Editorial dashboards provide visibility into review timelines, decision rates, and workload distribution. This helps editors manage assignments effectively.

Case Escalation

For sensitive cases such as potential misconduct or disputes, editors can escalate to the editorial leadership for guidance. This ensures consistent handling and protects integrity.

Reviewer Briefs

Short reviewer briefs outline expectations for assessing methods, data integrity, and ethics. These briefs help editors maintain consistent review quality across topics.

Checklist Library

Editors can access structured checklists for clinical trials, animal studies, and data sharing. Using these tools reduces omissions during screening and improves review readiness.

Communication Templates

Email and decision templates help editors communicate with reviewers and authors efficiently. Templates ensure key information is included, such as deadlines, revision expectations, and policy reminders. Editors can customize templates to match specific cases while retaining core policy language. Using templates reduces administrative burden and ensures consistent messaging across the board. It also helps new editors ramp up quickly during their first assignments and minimizes errors in deadline communication with authors and reviewers across multiple time zones and cultures.