Editor ResourcesJournal of Endocrinology and Hormones
JEH provides templates and guidance to help editors manage reviews efficiently and fairly.
Resources Available
Editors receive decision templates, ethics guidance, and reviewer tools tailored to endocrine research and clinical studies.
Operational Support
The editorial office assists with reviewer invitations, conflict checks, and production coordination.
Best Practice Updates
Editors receive policy updates aligned with open science, clinical reporting, and data sharing standards.
Research Visibility and Trust
Endocrine Expertise
Peer review is guided by clinicians and scientists who understand hormone biology and metabolic disease.
Open Access Reach
Published articles are freely accessible to researchers, clinicians, and policy teams worldwide.
Metadata Quality
Structured metadata supports discovery, citation tracking, and persistent research records.
Ethics First
Clear policies on consent, data integrity, and conflicts protect patient focused research.
Request Editor Tools
Contact the editorial office for access to resources and templates.
Email the Editorial OfficeView Editor GuidelinesEmail: [email protected]
Decision Templates
Standardized templates help editors communicate clearly and consistently with authors.
Ethics Guidance
Quick references cover consent, data privacy, and clinical trial reporting expectations.
Reporting Checklists
Editors can access structured checklists for clinical and observational studies to promote transparent reporting and reduce revision cycles.
Data Availability Review
Guidance explains how to verify data availability statements and repository links so accepted papers meet open data and funder expectations.
Reviewer Management Tools
Templates for reviewer invitations and reminders help keep timelines on track while maintaining respectful, professional communication.
Decision Consistency
Calibration notes and example decisions help align editorial judgments across clinical, translational, and basic endocrine research submissions.
Production Handoff
Checklists support final checks on figures, permissions, and metadata accuracy before manuscripts move into copyediting and publication.
Statistical Review Support
Editors can reference methodological guidance for sample size, statistical reporting, and reproducibility to improve the quality of endocrine research assessments.
Conflict and Recusal
Tools outline when editors should recuse themselves and how to document conflicts to preserve impartial decision making.
Author Guidance Links
Quick links to author instructions and policies help editors provide targeted recommendations without lengthy back and forth.
Continuous Improvement
Editors can flag recurring issues and suggest updates to templates or policies. Feedback helps strengthen peer review quality and keeps guidance aligned with evolving endocrine research practices. Periodic summaries can highlight turnaround times, common reviewer notes, and bottlenecks so editors can align on improvements that enhance author experience and clinical relevance for readers.
