Reviewer ResourcesJournal of Endocrinology and Hormones
JEH provides guidance and templates to help reviewers deliver clear, consistent feedback.
Resources for Reviewers
Review templates, ethics guidance, and reporting standards are available to support consistent evaluation.
Guidelines and Checklists
Resources include summaries of CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, and other relevant guidelines to support evidence based review.
Support and Assistance
Contact the editorial office for help with review forms, deadlines, or policy questions.
Research Visibility and Trust
Endocrine Expertise
Peer review is guided by clinicians and scientists who understand hormone biology and metabolic disease.
Open Access Reach
Published articles are freely accessible to researchers, clinicians, and policy teams worldwide.
Metadata Quality
Structured metadata supports discovery, citation tracking, and persistent research records.
Ethics First
Clear policies on consent, data integrity, and conflicts protect patient focused research.
Request Reviewer Tools
Email the editorial office for access to reviewer resources.
Email the Editorial OfficeView Reviewer GuidelinesEmail: [email protected]
Consistency
Structured tools help maintain clear and respectful feedback that supports author revisions.
Review Quality
Checklists prompt reviewers to evaluate methodology, ethics, and clinical relevance systematically.
Sample Review Outline
Templates provide a suggested structure for summary, major comments, and minor edits. Using a consistent outline helps editors compare reviews and speeds decisions.
Statistical Reporting Aids
Reference notes highlight common statistical reporting issues such as missing confidence intervals, unclear endpoints, or mismatched sample sizes.
Ethics and Consent Checks
Quick guidance covers ethics approvals, consent language, and trial registration expectations so reviewers can flag compliance gaps early.
Data and Materials Access
Resources explain how to verify data availability statements and supplementary files. This supports reproducibility and responsible reuse.
Communication Tips
Recommendations encourage specific, actionable feedback and respectful tone. Clear comments reduce follow up questions and improve author revisions.
Timeline Reminders
Guidance includes best practices for managing review deadlines and requesting extensions. Timely reviews keep publication decisions moving efficiently.
Supplementary Materials
Notes explain how to assess appendices, datasets, and protocols for completeness. Reviewers can flag missing materials or unclear documentation.
Ethical Considerations
Resources summarize red flags for plagiarism, image manipulation, and undisclosed conflicts. Reviewers can alert editors when concerns arise.
Scope Reminders
Brief guidance clarifies scope so reviewers focus on scientific validity, clinical relevance, and reporting quality rather than copyediting. Minor language notes are welcome but should not replace core methodological evaluation and statistical checks. This focus supports efficient decisions and consistent reviewer expectations across submissions.
