Journal of Verbal Behavior

Journal of Verbal Behavior

Journal of Verbal Behavior – Reviewer Register

Open Access & Peer-Reviewed

Submit Manuscript
JVB Reviewer Registration

Reviewer RegisterJoin the reviewer community

Register to support rigorous peer review in verbal behavior research.

Publishing Standards: Rigorous peer review, ethical oversight, open access distribution, DOI registration, and data transparency designed for verbal behavior and communication science.

Who Should Register

We invite researchers, clinicians, and practitioners with experience in behavior analysis and communication science.

Profile Details

Information we need

DetailExamplesPurpose
ExpertiseVerbal operants, AAC, autism intervention.Match to topics.
MethodsSingle case design, RCTs, assessment tools.Align with design.
AvailabilityReviews per year.Timely decisions.

Registration Steps

How to join

Send Details

Email your CV and keywords.

Review

Editorial office verifies expertise.

Confirmation

You receive a reviewer profile.

Begin Reviewing

Accept assignments aligned with expertise.

Register as Reviewer

Join the JVB reviewer community and support high quality research.

Email the Editorial OfficeRequest Information

Recognition

Active reviewers may receive certificates and acknowledgements based on review quality and timeliness.

Required Details

Include a short bio, CV, and a list of recent publications. These materials help match you to appropriate manuscripts.

Expertise Keywords

List topic areas such as verbal operants, AAC, autism intervention, or language assessment. Keywords improve manuscript matching.

Availability

Indicate how many reviews you can complete per year and preferred turnaround times. Clear availability helps manage workloads.

Conflicts and Ethics

Disclose any conflicts or affiliations that could influence reviews. Reviewers must follow confidentiality standards and ethical guidelines.

Onboarding Support

New reviewers receive guidance on evaluation criteria, decision categories, and reporting standards to ensure consistent feedback.

Communication

Keep your contact information current so the editorial office can send invitations and reminders without delays.

Review Quality

Reviewers are expected to provide fair, evidence based evaluations and avoid personal criticism. Clear feedback supports editorial decisions.

Training Resources

Access to reviewer checklists and reporting guideline summaries is provided to support consistent evaluations.

Confirmation

Once approved, reviewers receive confirmation and onboarding instructions. The editorial office can answer questions about expectations.

Topic Preferences

Let us know specific populations or interventions you prefer, such as early language development or AAC device training. Clear preferences improve matching.

Availability Updates

If your workload changes, notify the editorial office so invitations align with your capacity and response times. Regular updates ensure a balanced reviewer pool and reduce delayed decisions for authors across special issues and regular submissions throughout the year as research volumes fluctuate by season and topic to maintain timely reviews overall.